Girardi | Keese

When products cause harm, class actions can be part of recovery

California residents should be able to trust that products, drugs and food they use or ingest are safe. Manufacturers, who are in business to make money, sometimes choose to overlook a design flaw, cut corners in the process or disregard some safety regulation. When it comes to product liability, they often have the resources necessary to combat a lawsuit brought by an injured individual or the family of a loved one lost.

Fighting back against an unsafe product can be successful, however, when multiple injured parties stick together in a mass tort action. While it can be based out of California, this type of action can encompass a group of people nationwide who are seeking compensation for expenses or loss, and who are looking to hold a business accountable when negligence or deceit is at play.

Many people are familiar with class action lawsuits. These are civil cases where a group of people are classified as plaintiffs in a particular cause of action, but represented as a whole by a selected plaintiff. In mass tort litigation, each case must present, for example, individual harm or injury to each plaintiff involved allegedly perpetrated by the defendant. Common injuries to a group of people include defective medical devices such as hip replacement components, pharmaceuticals that turn out to be unsafe and toys with dangerous design elements.

One of the keys to successful litigation, however, is the advocate's ability to persevere on behalf of the victims. Manufacturers who make choices that are dangerous to consumers will likely fight any allegations strenuously – and have the money and time to do it. Injured folks want to recover, and surviving families need to know they have some financial security going forward.

Accidents happen. In some cases, companies' intentions are good, but something just goes wrong. On the other hand, when product liability possibilities affect a group of injured people, it's a good idea to explore legal remedies and options that, at the very least, might improve safety and protect future consumers.

Source: Girardi Keese, "Fighting Back Against Unsafe Products" Sep. 03, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Review Us
Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017