Girardi | Keese

California class action suit against Apple began with 4 people

In 2011, four Apple employees reportedly filed a suit against the company, alleging various violations to the California Labor Code. Approximately three years later, the case has been certified as a class action, widening the plaintiff pool to a possible 20,000 former and current Apple workers.

According to the original lawsuit, Apple is being accused of failure to provide timely rest and meal breaks. The company also allegedly failed to provide timely final paychecks to employees who left Apple. According to document and claims from various workers, the allegations range widely.

One person reports receiving a final paycheck two days after the required period. In another instance, a worker reports being required to work for five hours without a break.

An initial document in the class action case cited a potential for 18,000 workers impacted. That number was reportedly an estimate based on information provided by Apple. At this time, says one attorney, the number of potentially impacted employees and former workers has reached over 20,000 and continues to grow.

According to reports, this is not the first and only class action suit Apple faces. Another recently settled case involved tech workers who claimed that companies such as Apple were conspiring to reduce worker salaries; the conspiracy involved an alleged agreement between companies such as Google, Apple, Adobe and Intel not to poach workers from one another.

In any class action case, details are usually numerous and legal requirements can become complex. It's important to understand the proper method for bringing such a suit and growing it to class-action proportions. Even after a suit is certified as a class action, legal requirements continue and must be followed to help ensure success.

Source: TechCrunch, "Apple Faces Class-Action Lawsuit In California Over Alleged Labor Violations Affecting 20K Employees" Ingrid Lunden, Jul. 22, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017