Girardi | Keese

2 pharmaceutical litigation cases against Actos

California residents may have seen advertisements regarding the possible link between diabetic drug Actos and bladder cancer. In two separate states, plaintiffs are presenting evidence in cases that could build a foundation for global settlements with the maker of the drug. One case featured closing arguments on Monday, April 7. The other pharmaceutical litigation case resumed court proceedings following a two-week hiatus.

The case that resumed proceedings involves two women, ages 80 and 81. Both women accuse the company of hiding bladder cancer risks from patients and physicians. The women have diabetes and began taken Actos. Both allege that they developed bladder cancer after taking the medication.

The woman filed suit in another state in Dec. 2013. Currently, the plaintiff attorneys are calling expert witnesses to testify about the link between Actos and bladder cancer. They will also try to prove that the company knew about the link and withheld the information.

The second case, which closed on April 7, was the first federal suit against the company. It began on Feb. 3 and is being watched by attorneys and patients across the country.

Mass torts related to possible negligence from a drug maker or any manufacturer require an understanding of the law and a proper approach to the case. Many times, legal experts will wait for the outcome of a single case before moving forward with a class-action case or settlement. Being up to date on legal news within the industry can increase the chance that a claim for compensation is successful, especially when plaintiffs are going up against large medical, pharmaceutical, chemical or technical companies.

Source: Drug Watch, "Billion-Dollar Lawsuit Against Actos Resumes Today" Beau Hooks, Apr. 07, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017