Girardi | Keese

California based Whole Foods hit with class action lawsuit

Many of our California readers, along with those in other parts of the country, are familiar with Whole Foods Market Inc. These stores are well known for selling high quality, organic food.

Despite the fact that the grocery chain is based in Austin, Texas, it has individual units all over the country. Recently, a Fresno-based Whole Foods Market store was hit with a class action lawsuit due to claims that its online form seeking approval from job applicants' for criminal checks was in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The lawsuit was filed last week in U.S. District Court in Oakland, California. It claims that the application form used by Whole Foods has been presented to applicants since January 2009. The lawsuit is seeking damages of as much as $1,000 for every individual that the store obtained a customer report for, along with punitive damages.

The lawsuit states, "The online authorization forms all contained language releasing those who obtained the consumer reports from all liability, in violation of the FCRA's requirement that the authorizations be pristine documents that contain nothing other than the required disclosures and the requested authorization."

Although the plaintiff who was hired in May 2011 no longer works at the store, he still has the ability to file a lawsuit.

These types of class action lawsuits are more common than many people realize, requiring the attention of an experienced and knowledgeable attorney. While Whole Foods has yet to comment, more information will likely come out in the near future.

Source: Business Insurance, "Whole Foods faces class action suit over criminal background checks" Judy Greenwald, Feb. 11, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Review Us
Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017