Girardi | Keese

Easton Sports hit with lawsuit over alleged dangerous bat

Easton Sports Inc., a sporting goods manufacturer based out of Van Nuys, California, has been sued by an 18-year-old. The lawsuit claims the company's BT265 aluminum bat is "unreasonably dangerous" and has a defective design.

The teen was hit in the head in 2009 by a ball hit by the bat during a baseball game while playing for the Cincinnati Stix. He was in a coma for four days and after awakening, he was not able to talk, walk or move his right side. His lawsuit alleges that Easton Sports designed the BT265 in such a way that injuries are more likely to happen when the bat is used during a game because players are able to hit the ball faster and harder than they can with other bats.

Because of the bat's design, the ball player said in the lawsuit that the sporting good manufacturer had a responsibility to inform baseball players that there were possible dangers to using the bat. This would have allowed ball players to properly protect themselves against injury from balls hit with the bat. Because the company did not do so, the company is responsible for compensatory and punitive damages, according to the lawsuit.

The teen's father told media sources that his son's medical care has cost nearly $1 million; however, insurance has covered as much as 90 percent. Easton Sports has not commented on the lawsuit.

Manufacturers of dangerous products are required to inform consumers of potential dangers. Consumers who are injured because of flawed designs have recourse through the civil court system for such claims as medical expense, pain and suffering, lost wages, emotional distress and other damages.

Source:, "Lawsuit: Easton Sports baseball bat too dangerous" Kelly Goff, Sep. 25, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017