Girardi | Keese

Is the USDA's pilot program in pork plants putting you in danger?

In 1997, the U.S. Department of Agriculture launched a pilot program that allowed five large hog plants to speed up line productions and use company employees as inspectors instead of government personnel. It was thought that the pilot would be largely successful and would reduce the price of pork products in the market. Unfortunately, an overview look at the study shows that there are more problems with the new system than could be anticipated.

According to audits of the plants, three out of the five have racked up numerous health and safety violations, including numerous instances of meat contamination. This is particularly alarming because these three plants had worse food-safety records than the hundreds of other hog plants across the nation that operate under the traditional inspection system.

Many government inspectors attribute the contamination to the acceleration of line speeds and say that their reduced presence in these plants means that they are no longer in charge of safety. While some contaminated batches were caught by government inspectors before they left the plants, some inspectors pointed out that they were not discovered until the end of the process, far too late by many standards. Some aren’t even caught, leading to costly recalls and the potential for causing food-borne illnesses across the nation.

Similar programs conducted in other countries such as Canada and Australia are showing similar health and safety problems. Just recently a Canadian processing plant had to recall 8.8 million pounds of beef because of E. coli, of which about 2.5 million pounds were sold in the United States. As our readers here in California know, food-borne illnesses can turn even ordinary items into dangerous products, leading many to wonder if this pilot study is doing more harm than good.

Source: The Washington Post, "USDA pilot program fails to stop contaminated meat," Kimberly Kindy, Sept. 8, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017