Girardi | Keese

Consumer Advocates: Increase Medical Malpractice Noneconomic Damage Cap

Thirty-eight years ago, the California Legislature passed a medical malpractice law that capped noneconomic damages at $250,000. With inflation, that's equal to more than one million dollars today. Yet, legislation rarely takes inflation into account, which means today's victims of medical malpractice are also victims of the law.

That is why many consumer advocates, the nurses union and other safety advocates (including injury lawyers) are seeking to change the law to account for inflation. They do not believe the Legislature will pass a bill to make these changes, so they plan to take them to the voting public. In September, they will begin to gather the 400,000 signatures they need to get the issue on the ballot in November 2014.

Opponents of the move argue that increasing the noneconomic damages cap would increase medical costs. Proponents counter that there is very little evidence that these caps significantly reduce medical costs, and that victims of medical malpractice end up footing the bill. Should the initiative make it to the ballot and be passed, it would raise the state's damage cap to $1 million and allow for a yearly increase based on inflation.

There is currently no cap on economic damages or punitive damages in California. Economic damages are direct damages that a person suffers as the result of medical negligence, such as medical expenses and income loss. Punitive damages punish medical professionals for "malicious and willful misconduct." Noneconomic damages, on the other hand, look to a victim's (or family's) emotional / psychological suffering. Together, the three types of damages make up a victim's entire damage award.

Source: Los Angeles times, "Battle flares over 38-year-old medical malpractice law," Marc Lifsher, July 14, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Review Us
Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017