Girardi | Keese

Legal dispute between CPSC and company escalates

In a majority of cases, when the Consumer Product Safety Commission issues a recall for a product, it's generally done with the help of the company who is providing the product. Together, both parties usually come up with a plan to make the product safer for consumers.

At least, that's how it usually goes in a majority of cases. But in a recent set of lawsuits out of Pennsylvania, a company is fighting back against the CPSC for its push for a mandatory recall. But in order to get the entire story, we'll have to go back to 2010 where it all began.

Following the death of an infant who had been using one of Baby Matters, LLC's products, Nap Nanny recliner, the CPSC and Baby Matters issued a joint recall, warning consumers that there was a defect in the product. After extensive changes to the design and safety warnings, the company released their second generation of the recliner.

But despite changes, the CPSC continued to receive reports of injuries and deaths. Now armed with a total of 70 incident reports, and five confirmed deaths, the CPSC decided that more drastic steps needed to be taken. On December 5, 2012, the agency announced that it had filed an administrative complaint against Baby Matters which would effectively require the company to notify the public of the defect and offer consumers a full refund.

In the wake of the lawsuit, Baby Matters has closed its doors, but in a startling move has issued its own lawsuit which seeks to dismiss the CPSC's attempt to enforce a mandatory recall. Baby Matters' legal team claims that the mandatory recall was merely a "vehicle to give the commission leverage to strong-arm a complete recall without having to prove its case."

Some legal experts argue otherwise, pointing out that the CPSC has collected dozens of reports that indicate-despite changes in design and warnings-that the product is still defective and a safety risk to children nationwide and should be removed from retail shelves until further safety modifications can be made.

Source: The Consumerist, "Maker of 'Nap Nanny' Fights Recall of Product Linked to Death of Five Infants," Chris Morran, Jan. 3, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017