Girardi | Keese

Medical Malpractice: Government Program Looks For Patient Input

Medical mistakes occur with frightening frequency in the United States. A new government pilot program is exploring a different angle to help improve healthcare by harnessing patient perspectives and reports. If this program is successful, it might be a big step towards reducing common medical malpractice scenarios liked missed diagnoses and treatment errors.

The program plans to ask for voluntary patient feedback on recent treatment experiences. Patients will be able to submit detailed information on a website or through telephone interviews. Since the government is taking an appropriately broad view of care, the program will solicit feedback on everything from obvious treatment errors to patients' perceptions of safety concerns.

One of the reasons that medical errors are so common is that problems often go unreported. Patients may not be aware that an unpleasant experience is actually malpractice instead of just part of the recovery process. If patients communicated these concerns, the results might shed more light on recurring problems.

Although some studies show that up to 25 percent of patients experience "adverse events," the same research showed that many of these problems never show up in medical records.

Missed diagnoses are a particularly dangerous but frighteningly common type of medical error. If medical professionals fail to appropriately respond to indications of a health condition or complication, the results can be life threatening. While medical malpractice lawsuits can help victims recover for the consequences of these errors, it would be better to prevent them altogether.

Source: The New York Times, "New System for Patients to Report Medical Mistakes," Robert Pear, Sept. 22, 2012

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result. Any testimonials and endorsements at this site do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter or potential legal matter.


The Soto Verdict

Girardi | Keese attorneys have won a $2.3M verdict for a Long Beach resident run over by a Parks & Rec truck. Read more here.

The Madero Verdict

Attorney Christopher T. Aumais persuaded a San Bernardino County jury to deliver an  exceptionally high verdict in an area known for low jury awards.

A Champion of Justice

Partner Amy Fisch Solomon was a Champion of Justice in 2015, proving that success in law isn't just about the size of your verdict or settlement.

Own a VW Diesel?

Read about VW's emissions scandal and 
our class action against the automaker.


Learn About Our Referral Network Read More

Our Attorneys

Meet our award-winning team Read More


The true measure of a lawyer isn’t the awards, but what the awards say about the lawyer: dedication and commitment to the client.

Review Us
Super Lawyers Distinguished AV | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability American Association For Justice Consumer Attorneys Association Of Los Angeles Consumer Attorneys California Supreme Court Icon 7 Icon Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms 2014 | U.S. News American Board of Trial Advocates Law Dragon America's Top 100 Attorneys | Lifetime Achievement Martindale-Hubbell | AV Preeminent | Peer Review Rated For Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2017